KL16 tyre reviews
We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.
To the shop categories:
4x4 tyres
KL16 tyre review
|
Grip in dry conditions Braking in dry conditions Grip in wet conditions Braking in wet conditions Grip in snow |
Driving comfort Internal noise level Tyre wear Fuel consumption |
Average based on 4 test results
Ø 157,041 km driven
| 19.10.2014 from | Note 3.09 |
| (6,437 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions N/A
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
215 / 65 R16
FORD
Result: Would you buy again? Possibly
215 / 65 R16
FORD
Result: Would you buy again? Possibly
| 14.05.2014 from | Note 4.44 |
| (15,772 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions N/A
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
215 / 65
CHEVROLET
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
215 / 65
CHEVROLET
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
| 25.02.2014 from | Note 4.98 |
| (4,828 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
/ 0
FORD
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Good value and queality
/ 0
FORD
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Good value and queality
| 01.10.2011 from | Note 3.43 |
| (65,000 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
245 / 65 R17 H
Result: Would you buy again? Probably
245 / 65 R17 H
Result: Would you buy again? Probably