VentusS1evoK107 tyre reviews
We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.
To the shop categories:
Car summer tyres
VentusS1evoK107 tyre review
|
Grip in dry conditions Braking in dry conditions Grip in wet conditions Braking in wet conditions Grip in snow |
Driving comfort Internal noise level Tyre wear Fuel consumption |
Average based on 16 test results
Ø 7,869,266 km driven
| 20.02.2018 from Antonio Carrero Torralba | Note 3.15 |
| (35,000 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions N/A
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
/ 0
Result: Would you buy again? N/A
/ 0
Result: Would you buy again? N/A
| 10.12.2016 from Björn Hilkens | Note 4.75 |
| (81,000 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions N/A
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
195 / 45 R16 V
Ford Fiesta
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
195 / 45 R16 V
Ford Fiesta
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
| 19.11.2015 from Chris Morris | Note 4.55 |
| (9,000 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions N/A
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
205 / 55 R16 V
KIA ceed
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Surprisingly good tyre for the price. Doesn't really get great reviews in some tyre tests which is strange. Great dry grip,giving the Ceed a much needed improvement with it's turn-in. Not bad wet grip although standing water can cause them a few problems. They are rated an 'f' for fuel economy if memory serves but average m.p.g has only dropped by 2/3 compared to a 'c' rated tyre previously ran. Worth the drop for far superior grip. Wearing extremely well,especially resistant to under steer which knocks the outside edge off the nearside tyre. Not used them in the winter weather(I fit winter tyres)but I would guess they won't be the best judging by the tread patten alone.
205 / 55 R16 V
KIA ceed
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Surprisingly good tyre for the price. Doesn't really get great reviews in some tyre tests which is strange. Great dry grip,giving the Ceed a much needed improvement with it's turn-in. Not bad wet grip although standing water can cause them a few problems. They are rated an 'f' for fuel economy if memory serves but average m.p.g has only dropped by 2/3 compared to a 'c' rated tyre previously ran. Worth the drop for far superior grip. Wearing extremely well,especially resistant to under steer which knocks the outside edge off the nearside tyre. Not used them in the winter weather(I fit winter tyres)but I would guess they won't be the best judging by the tread patten alone.
| 04.01.2014 from Mark | Note 4.45 |
| (10,000 km driven) |
- Grip in dry conditions
- Braking in dry conditions
- Grip in wet conditions
- Braking in wet conditions
- Grip in snow
- Driving comfort
- Internal noise level
- Tyre wear
- Fuel consumption N/A
Tyre size and vehicle make
205 / 45 R16 V
RENAULT
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Cheaper than discontinued Michelin PE2 but very similar performance. Better steering feel than Pirelli P Zero Nero. Much better value than Michelin PS3.
205 / 45 R16 V
RENAULT
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Cheaper than discontinued Michelin PE2 but very similar performance. Better steering feel than Pirelli P Zero Nero. Much better value than Michelin PS3.